Use five hospital RTLS planning questions to define workflows, accuracy, infrastructure, integrations, and ownership before finalizing your plan.
Hospital technology plans must turn operational needs into infrastructure drawings, budgets, and procurement requirements while construction schedules continue to shift. If RTLS requirements remain undefined during that process, the hospital may commit to infrastructure before understanding the location performance its workflows need.
Hospital RTLS planning should resolve five decisions before the technology plan is finalized: which workflows need location data, what accuracy they require, how the infrastructure will support them, which systems need to connect, and who will own the system after go-live.
For healthcare consultants and hospital technology teams, these decisions provide a practical basis for evaluating proposals. They also help separate opening-day requirements from future applications without assuming that every department needs the same architecture.
Key takeaways for hospital RTLS planning
- Define opening-day workflows and future applications so infrastructure decisions reflect operational priorities rather than an undifferentiated feature list.
- Match location accuracy, update frequency, and acceptance criteria to each workflow instead of specifying one facility-wide target.
- Validate planned infrastructure against location requirements before access point placement, cabling, and related construction decisions become fixed.
- Document integration data flows, security requirements, responsible teams, and acceptance tests before committing to an RTLS architecture.
- Assign system and workflow owners before go-live, including responsibility for tags, training, support, and future use cases.
Five questions to resolve before finalizing your RTLS plan
Your RTLS plan should translate each of these questions into documented requirements that vendors and hospital stakeholders can evaluate against the same criteria.
1. Which workflows need location data?
Start by identifying the decisions or actions that location information must support. Equipment retrieval, staff duress response, patient flow, hand hygiene, and environmental monitoring involve different users, events, and operating requirements.
For hospital asset tracking, the problem might be finding an available infusion pump on a nursing unit. Document who searches for equipment, what information they need, and how equipment availability or search time will be measured.
For staff duress response, define what happens after a badge is activated: who receives the alert, what location information they receive, and how the response is escalated. Location visibility must fit the hospital’s response protocol.
Distinguish location-dependent workflows from sensor-dependent applications. Temperature monitoring, for example, needs defined measurement and alert requirements as well as identification of the monitored storage location. It should not automatically inherit the tracking requirements of a moving asset.
Planning output: Create a use-case register identifying the operational problem, users, required action, update frequency, success measure, workflow owner, and deployment phase. Mark each application as required at opening or planned for later.
2. What location accuracy does each workflow require?
Specify accuracy according to the operational task, together with update frequency, coverage, and reliability. A precision claim alone does not establish that a system can support a hospital workflow.
Room-level or zone-level visibility may be sufficient when staff need to identify where equipment is stored. Other applications may require finer positioning. For patient flow tracking, identifying entry into a care area may be more important than knowing an exact coordinate within it.
A duress workflow needs location information that responders can act on reliably. The hospital should define that requirement with security and clinical stakeholders rather than assume that every safety application requires the same numerical accuracy target.
Ask vendors to explain how performance will be demonstrated in the proposed environment. Testing should address room boundaries, movement between zones, location update delays, and the conditions under which the workflow must operate.
Planning output: Document workflow-specific location requirements and acceptance tests. State where performance must be achieved, what constitutes a correct location or event, how quickly information must update, and who will approve the results.
3. Can the planned infrastructure support those requirements?
Evaluate the infrastructure against RTLS location requirements before the design is finalized. Wireless coverage for connectivity does not, by itself, establish that a network can deliver the required location performance.
Access point placement, infrastructure density, BLE capabilities, network configuration, and physical room layouts can affect the proposed solution. The relevant requirements depend on the selected architecture and the workflows it must support.
Review the RTLS hardware alongside the network design. Identify which existing components can be reused, where additional gateways or beacons may be needed, and what cabling, power, mounting, or configuration work is required.
For new construction, incorporate those requirements before access point locations and ceiling plans are fixed. For renovations and network refreshes, plan to revalidate performance after changes to the wireless environment or physical layout.
Planning output: Prepare an infrastructure requirements matrix showing existing and additional components, installation dependencies, network and security requirements, design assumptions, and a location-performance validation plan. Include requirements for future expansion.
4. Which systems need RTLS data or events?
Identify what must happen after RTLS detects a location, movement, or sensor event. That action determines which systems need to connect and what information they must exchange. A tagged asset may need to enter a maintenance workflow. A patient crossing a defined boundary may trigger a status update. A duress event may need to notify security and nearby staff through established communications systems.
Depending on the workflow, integration targets may include EHR platforms, computerized maintenance management systems (CMMS), nurse call, physical security, analytics, and workflow automation systems. Include only the connections that serve a defined operational purpose. During RTLS vendor evaluation, review the proposed integration approach, supported interfaces, implementation responsibilities, and dependencies on other system vendors. An available API does not establish that a complete hospital workflow has been configured and tested. Define security review requirements, permitted data access, retention expectations, and behavior when an interface is unavailable. If an integration is planned for a later phase, document the architectural requirements now.
Planning output: Create an integration map listing the source and destination systems, exchanged data or events, responsible teams, security requirements, failure handling, and end-to-end acceptance tests.
5. Who will own RTLS after go-live?
Assign an accountable system owner and named operational owners before implementation ends. RTLS governance must cover platform administration, workflow performance, ongoing support, and decisions about expansion. The system owner should coordinate tag inventory, battery maintenance, user access, map and zone updates, software changes, and vendor support. Department-level owners should monitor whether individual workflows continue to meet operational needs.
A historical example illustrates why oversight belongs in the plan. The case underscores the need for documented oversight and acceptance milestones; it does not establish that RTLS technology generally cannot deliver value. The VA Office of Inspector General’s December 2017 review reported that, as of December 2016, $431 million had been obligated for RTLS assets and services without government acceptance of a functional RTLS solution. The review identified failures to follow required incremental project management and validation processes, along with security testing and approval deficiencies.
Include an executive sponsor, IT and infrastructure responsibilities, clinical or operational workflow owners, and a process for approving new use cases. Budget for training and support as ongoing responsibilities rather than one-time implementation tasks.
Planning output: Document a responsibility matrix, operating budget, support escalation process, training plan, performance review schedule, and criteria for approving system changes or expansion.
Hospital RTLS planning checklist for design review and procurement
A hospital RTLS checklist should capture the requirements, owners, and evidence needed to compare proposals and approve deployment.
- Use cases: Record opening-day priorities, future applications, user roles, baseline measures, and success criteria.
- Location performance: Specify accuracy, coverage, update frequency, reliability, and workflow-specific acceptance tests.
- Infrastructure: Confirm reusable components, additional hardware, installation dependencies, and the plan to validate location performance.
- Integrations: Identify required data flows, interface owners, security reviews, failure handling, and end-to-end tests.
- Governance: Assign platform and workflow owners, support responsibilities, training requirements, and expansion authority.
- Vendor evidence: Request architecture assumptions, relevant deployment references, implementation responsibilities, and demonstrations against your requirements.
- Acceptance milestones: Agree on what must be tested and approved before each deployment phase is considered complete.
Use the same RTLS planning checklist for each vendor. Comparable requirements and evidence make proposal differences easier to assess than feature lists alone.
Plan RTLS before requirements become expensive to change
A practical hospital RTLS implementation plan connects workflows, location requirements, infrastructure, integrations, and long-term ownership before technology selection.
AiRISTA supports healthcare RTLS applications including asset tracking, staff safety, patient flow, and environmental monitoring. Its sofia platform connects location and sensor information with configurable workflows, alerts, and integrations.
AiRISTA’s discovery process includes stakeholder engagement, needs assessment, and IT architecture readiness. Those conversations can help your project team connect operational requirements with an appropriate deployment approach.
Planning RTLS for a new or renovated hospital? Talk with AiRISTA before your technology plan is finalized.
FAQs about hospital RTLS planning
When should RTLS planning begin for a new hospital?
Begin RTLS planning while workflows and infrastructure designs can still be adjusted. Define initial use cases and location requirements before access point placement, cabling, and related construction decisions are fixed, then carry those requirements into procurement and acceptance testing.
Can a hospital reuse its existing wireless infrastructure for RTLS?
A hospital may be able to reuse existing wireless infrastructure, depending on the architecture and required performance. Validate compatibility, coverage, placement, and location performance rather than relying on connectivity maps alone. Additional components or configuration changes may be needed for particular workflows.
Does every hospital RTLS workflow require sub-meter accuracy?
No. The required accuracy depends on the task. Room-level or zone-level visibility may support equipment retrieval or area-level events, while other workflows need finer positioning. Define accuracy alongside coverage, update frequency, and reliability, and test performance against the hospital’s operational requirements.
Can hospital RTLS deployment be phased?
Yes. A phased deployment can validate selected workflows before expansion. Identify opening-day and later applications during planning, while accounting for the infrastructure, integration, and governance requirements of future phases. Each phase should have defined success measures and acceptance criteria.
What questions should hospitals ask RTLS vendors?
Ask vendors to demonstrate how their proposals meet your documented workflows, location requirements, infrastructure constraints, and integration needs. Request relevant references, explicit architecture assumptions, implementation responsibilities, acceptance tests, and ongoing support requirements. Compare the evidence against the same criteria for every proposal.
Who should own a hospital RTLS system?
A designated system owner should coordinate administration and support, with named department-level owners accountable for individual workflows. IT, clinical engineering, security, and clinical operations may share responsibilities, but the plan should specify decision authority, escalation paths, and ongoing funding before go-live
Sources
- Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General, Review of Alleged Mismanagement of VA’s Real Time Location System Project (2017).
- KLAS Research, Real-Time Location Systems (RTLS) 2011: Maximizing the ROI.
- Fierce Healthcare, Real-Time Location System Early Adopters Experience Varied Benefits, but Continue to Pursue Location-Technology ROI (2012).
- DOTmed, Saving Time and Money with RTLS: How Texas Health Employed Lean Strategies to Get Its Asset Tracking System Back in Gear (2020).
About The Author
